| Criteria
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Point Value |
| Paper
adequately explains both sides of a medical ethics topic |
Paper is inadequate
not clearly explaining both sides of the topic
0-20 pts
|
Paper explains only 1
side of the debate
20-30 pts
|
aper explains both
sides of the topic but is not backed by adequate research
30-45 pts
|
Paper clearly defines
both sides of the topic and is adequately backed by research
50 pts
|
70 |
| Paper is well organized
and includes an introduction, body, and summarizing paragraph
|
Paper is difficult to
follow and does not include an introduction or summary.
0-3
|
Paper is missing an
introduction, body, or summary
4-6.
|
Paper contains an
introduction, body, and summary but is unclear
7-9
|
Paper is well
organized and contains an introduction, body, and summarizing paragraph.
10 pts
|
10 |
| Document is free of
spelling and grammatical errors. |
Multiple spelling
and/or grammatical mistakes.
0 pts
|
4-9 spelling or
grammatical errors
1-6 pts
|
1-3 spelling or
grammatical errors
7-10 pts
|
No errors in spelling
or grammar
10 pts
|
10 |
| A minimum of
3 internet and 2 refereed journals or books are included for reference.
|
No references are
included.
0 pts
|
Less than 5 references
included and/or references are of poor quality.
1-5 pts
|
Appropriate number of
references included but of questionable quality
6-9 pts
|
3 internet and 2
refereed journal or book references are provided.
10 pts
|
10 |
| |
|
|
|
|
100 |
